Learn about the sub judice rule in the UK Parliament. This rule prevents Members of Parliament (MPs) from discussing matters currently being decided in court. Its purpose is to stop parliamentary discussion from influencing court outcomes and to uphold the independence of the judiciary. Learn about the rule's history, including its 2001 revision that clarified its application to committees and defined when cases are considered 'active'. Discover the Speaker's role in exercising discretion to allow discussion in certain circumstances.
Key Takeaways:
Important Definitions and Concepts:
Discussion: The sub judice rule balances Parliament's right to discuss any matter with the need to protect court proceedings from potential prejudice. How effectively do you think this balance is struck, and what challenges might arise in applying the rule in a fast-moving political and media landscape?
Source: The sub judice rule
Research Briefing
Published Friday, 06 June, 2
Follow and subscribe to 'The Bench Report' on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and YouTube for new episodes Mon-Thurs: thebenchreport.co.uk
Subscribe to our Substack for in depth analysis of debates past and present.
Shape our next episode or article! Get in touch with an issue important to you - Producer Tom will grab another coffee and start the research!
Email us: [email protected]
Follow us on YouTube, X, Bluesky, Facebook and Instagram @BenchReportUK
Support us for bonus and extended episodes + more.
No outside chatter: source material only taken from Hansard and the Parliament UK website.
Contains Parliamentary information repurposed under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0....