Oregon Law News, Jun 2025 (S2:E2)

Oregon Reporter Podcast

Oregon Law News, June 2025 (S2:E2); 

Date of Publishing: June 2, 2025

MCLE ID No: 123205

(Approved by the OSB MCLE department on June 9, 2025)

*********************************** 

This episode of the Oregon Reporter Podcast qualifies you for one general CLE Credit (upon its approval by the OSB MCLE department), which can be self-reported on your MCLE transcript. 

For Instructions on self-reporting this credit, click HERE. 

*********************************** 

Show Notes: 

Casala, LLC v. Kotek (re BM 119 “Labor Peace Agreement” Requirement)

Opinion

Harris Sliwoski Blog Post 

SB 1101 (PL 280 Retrocession)

Text of Bill 

Legislative Overview

OPB Article

Woodland v. Hill (Lil Nas X Case) 

Opinion

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Decision (SCOTUS re 2 Live Crew) 

Wikipedia Page re Campbell v. Acuff-Rose

USA v. Yafa

Opinion

Yelp v. Paxton

Opinion   

*********************************** 

This Episode’s Sponsors: 

CC Reporting: providing remote court reporting services across the state of Oregon, and in-person coverage from Salem to Medford. Schedule online at CCReporting.com. CC Reporting: we've got you covered. 

Watkinson Laird Rubenstein: serving Oregon for 30 years from offices in Eugene, Roseburg, Grants Pass, and Bend.  Business Law, Estate Planning, Real Estate transactions, and Civil Litigation.  Visit wlrlaw.com for more information.

*********************************** 

Support The Oregon Reporter Podcast: 

Support us at patreon.com/OregonReporterPodcast

***********************************

Intro/Outro Music: 

“Happy Boy Theme,” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetch.com)

Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License

Creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

“Happy Boy End Theme,” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetch.com)

Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License

Creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Music Clip Use (Fair Use):

Excerpt from “Pretty Woman” by 2 Live Crew, used for educational and commentary purposes under the Fair Use doctrine (17 U.S.C. § 107). This use is consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), which affirmed the transformative, parodic nature of the work. This podcast is a non-commercial, nonprofit production published by a 501(c)(3) organization.

All Rights Reserved by Oregon Reporter Podcast, LLC; no part of this show may be reproduced, distributed, or adapted without permission. 

For all inquiries: [email protected]