AI image-generation models I’ve tried
Midjourney is best at producing a diverse and aesthetically pleasing range of styles and doesn’t refuse “in the style of…” requests. However, it is worst at text-in-images, avoiding uncanny AI artifacts (like extra fingers or unrealistic postures), and precise instruction-following (it messes up the specifics). Another major downside is that they don’t offer an API.
GPT-5 produces less artistic outputs but is better at following precise instructions on text and composition details.
Gemini “Nano Banana” is somewhere in the middle where it is ok-ish at everything—better at style than GPT-5 but worse than Midjourney, better at instruction-following than Midjourney but worse than GPT-5.
Midjourney v7 messing up instruction-following (basically none of these are images of a robot pushing a computer up a hill)GPT-5 with the same prompt. It followed the instruction, but the style isn’t as nice, and it messed up [...]---
Outline:
(00:12) AI image-generation models I've tried
(01:38) Styles that look good
(02:27) Compositions that look good
(02:47) Correcting artifacts with programmatic post-processing
---
First published:
September 4th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wdnjXoQGbHGAKQcyW/how-to-make-better-ai-art-with-current-models
Linkpost URL:
https://blog.ninapanickssery.com/p/how-to-make-ai-art-look-good
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.