HEADLINES
Fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire tests Saraya al-Jawad
Doha Hamas leadership strike draws US-Qatar tensions
PA funding squeeze threatens Gaza essential services
The time is now 3:00 AM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.
This hour’s briefing surveys a fragile security landscape in the Middle East and related developments abroad, with an emphasis on the balance between security measures and diplomatic efforts.
First, the uneasy ceasefire between Israel and Iran remains fragile. In recent days, Tehran’s regional proxies have shown no clear sign of standdown, even as diplomatic channels attempt to hold lines. A new faction in Syria, Saraya al-Jawad, has drawn attention as experts weigh whether it is a local offshoot connected to coastal networks, a proxy feeding new labels into regional conflict dynamics, or a propaganda vehicle aimed at sowing instability. The question of who commands and coordinates such groups matters for both Israeli security calculations and broader international efforts to prevent a cascading cycle of retaliation.
In the broader theater of Iran’s proxies, the Syrian landscape is shifting. The government under a new configuration, following the ouster or restructuring of leadership allied with Damascus, has implications for how external forces project power, threaten border stability, and affect governance inside Syria. Hezbollah’s standing has been degraded by Israeli military pressure in Lebanon and by ongoing efforts in Beirut and beyond to reduce the group’s operational footprint. Lebanon’s leadership and security services have signaled a resolve to push back against the presence of Hezbollah, seeking to curb militant infrastructure and restore political legitimacy in the face of regional upheaval. Alongside this, Hamas in Gaza has faced operational setbacks, even as the group maintains the hostage situation at the center of its conflict with Israel. Reports repeatedly emphasize that while Hamas’ external capabilities appear constrained, the hostage crisis remains a critical lever for negotiations and international attention.
Amid these shifts, regional and international alignments continue to test longstanding arrangements. Israel’s surprise strike against Hamas leadership in Doha drew a sharp rebuke from Qatar and triggered broader questions about how the United States, under current and former administrations, coordinates with allies in the region. Analysts note that Washington’s response highlighted a structural comfort with Israel’s security posture even as leaders on both sides sought to manage the diplomatic fallout. While some observers warn of a potential rift in the Trump-Netanyahu dynamic, others say the alliance is primarily transactional and likely to endure, given shared interests in weakening Hamas and countering Iran’s nuclear and regional ambitions. The attacks also underscored how rapid moves on the ground can outpace diplomatic signaling and complicate even well-trodden pathways to peace through strength.
In parallel, external powers have weighed in on regional security questions. An analytical piece examining the Qatar situation notes that the United States can press Israel toward certain decisions, while Israeli leadership is expected to pursue what it views as essential security goals. The United States has signaled that it will not tolerate a meaningful realignment that weakens Israel’s ability to neutralize threats emanating from Gaza and Hezbollah-backed networks, even as Washington seeks to maintain constructive engagement with Gulf partners. The broader takeaway is that security coordination remains essential, even as bilateral ties face moments of friction prompted by fast-moving events.
Beyond the core conflict zones, other incidents and developments continue to shape the risk environment. In the realm of counterterrorism and...