#124 AimPoint's Geometric Inaccuracies in Putting

The Podcast to today where we dive into the world of putting techniques and examine one of the most popular methods:

AimPoint.

While AimPoint has gained significant traction among golfers, there are critical geometrical inconsistencies that need to be addressed.

The Problem with AimPoint

AimPoint's green-reading technique is based on using finger positioning to determine the break angle of a putt. However, the accuracy of this method heavily depends on maintaining a precise ratio between the width of the finger and the distance from the eye.

Here’s where it gets complicated:

1. Finger Width Matters: The width of each player’s finger varies. For example, if a finger is 0.5 inches wide, the distance from the eye to the finger should be 12 inches. But for fingers that are 0.75 inches wide, the distance should increase to 18 inches.

2. Inconsistent Implementation: Observations show that many players hold their fingers at different distances from their eyes, often stretching their arms fully. This leads to incorrect angles and inaccurate putt reads.

3. Adjustments for Green Speed: AimPoint also suggests altering the distance for different green speeds. For faster greens, the distance is reduced, while for slower greens, it’s increased. This introduces further complexity and increases the likelihood of error.

The Correct Geometry

The geometrical principle behind AimPoint relies on proportional triangles. The finger-eye distance forms one side of the triangle, while the finger width represents another. The break angle depends on the tangent of the ratio between these sides.

Here are some key calculations:

- A finger width (W) of 0.5 inches requires a distance (d) of 12 inches for an accurate 2.38° break angle on a standard Stimp 10’ green.

- For a finger width of 0.75 inches, the distance increases to 18 inches.

- Any deviation from these proportions results in incorrect putt angles, leading to missed opportunities on the green.

Examples of Optimal Eye-to-Finger Distances Based on Width:

W = 0.4 inches → d = 9.6 inches

W = 0.5 inches → d = 12 inches

W = 0.75 inches → d = 18 inches

W = 0.8 inches → d = 19.25 Inches

Introducing Alternative Methods

If you’re looking for a more accurate and reliable way to read greens, consider the Puttalyze App. Unlike AimPoint, Puttalyze uses precise calculations to factor in:

- Green speed.

- Slope and resistance.

- Curved putts and optimal putting distances.

The app ensures consistency and eliminates the guesswork often associated with methods like AimPoint.

Conclusion:

AimPoint’s concept is based on sound geometry, but the practical application leaves room for significant errors due to improper implementation and a lack of focus on individualized measurements. Tools like Puttalyze provide a more accurate, user-friendly alternative for improving your putting game.

If you’d like to dive deeper into this topic or have questions about these methods, feel free to reach out. Thanks for tuning in, and we’ll catch you in the next episode!

Podcast:

Detailed analysis of AimPoint's geometry and calculations, with examples highlighting inconsistencies and alternative methods like the Puttalyze App.

• www.Golf247.eu


• World Scientific Congress of Golf XI 2024 Loughborough University