Clip of Senate hearing with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
That was a clip from a Senate hearing with Robert F Kennedy Jr, who, as many listeners will know, is the current US Secretary of Health and Human Services. In 2025, many folks around the world have become interested in the way that science currently works, particularly around the process of peer review. Peer review is a process where scientific journals ask experts in the field to evaluate the validity and accuracy of articles that are submitted to the journal. There are many challenges around peer review in the modern era, and one particularly thorny one is finding reviewers who have the time and expertise to provide high-quality reviews.
David Maslove is a Clinician Scientist in the Departments of Medicine and Critical Care Medicine at Queen’s University. He, along with economist Chris Cotton and a team of other researchers, recently published an article in the Journal of Critical Care Medicine entitled “Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial”. Dr. Maslove performed what is, in some ways, a very simple study conceptually – does paying reviewers increase the rate at which reviewers complete their reviews? We delve into this study in depth and hear Dr. Maslove’s thoughts on this really important topic.
What do you think? Do you think peer reviewers should be paid? Send us your thoughts via email at [email protected] or on X @coldsteelpod.
Links: