In Episode 40 of Cases & Cocktails, Bryan and Janice Eggleston are joined once again by attorney Jillian French for another installment of “Storytime,” where the team reviews real-life posts from Reddit and applies family law insights to the situations. Over a round of unique cocktails—a classic Dr. Pepper and a bold Tequila Espresso Martini—the trio examines a controversial story of infidelity, delayed divorce, and questionable timing.
The Reddit Post: Divorce the Day Before Graduation
The story features a husband who discovered his wife’s affair six years earlier. Although initially devastated, he chose to stay in the marriage after his wife showed remorse, entered therapy, and committed to rebuilding their relationship. For five years, things seemed fine—until a comment from his sister reignited his doubts.
The husband ultimately decided he could no longer remain in the marriage. The problem? He informed his wife of his decision to divorce the day before their daughter’s high school graduation—and told his daughter about it the day after.
His question to the Reddit community: Am I the asshole?
The Legal and Emotional Takeaways
Bryan, Janice, and Jillian agreed that while the decision to divorce was valid, the timing was problematic. Divorce in Texas, as they explained, doesn’t require a reason—simply a desire to end the marriage is enough. But delivering such life-altering news during a major milestone in a child’s life creates long-lasting emotional fallout.
The group highlighted how children—whether young or adults—remain deeply affected by the way their parents handle separation. Even at age 18, graduation is a pivotal moment, and tying it forever to a divorce announcement can leave a painful memory.
Engineers in Court: Fact vs. Feelings
One lighthearted aside in the episode focused on the husband’s methodical storytelling. His factual, emotionless tone reminded the attorneys of clients in highly analytical professions—particularly engineers. Judges and lawyers alike often notice how these clients recite details with precision, but without the emotional context courts sometimes expect. While not a flaw, it highlights the importance of recognizing personality differences in legal proceedings.
Reconciliation and Its Risks
The team also discussed the dangers of reconciliation in divorce cases. When a spouse admits wrongdoing, agrees to therapy, or makes sweeping lifestyle changes, it can create legal vulnerability if the marriage still fails later. Everything said in couples’ therapy, for example, can be subpoenaed—unlike private, individual therapy, which is confidential.
Clients are often tempted to dismiss (“nonsuit”) a divorce filing when trying to reconcile, but the Egglestons explained why keeping the case on file can be smarter. It preserves legal protections, ensures quicker court access if needed, and prevents the other spouse from gaining undue leverage.
The Bottom Line
While every marriage and divorce is unique, Episode 40 underscores a timeless truth: how and when you act matters just as much as why. The legal right to divorce is absolute—but choosing moments wisely can protect children, reduce emotional fallout, and strengthen a client’s position in court.