Lord Conrad Black Comes Out Swinging In Defense Of Prince Andrew

Lord Conrad Black, the former media mogul and life peer, has been one of the most outspoken defenders of Prince Andrew amid the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. In various public statements and op-eds, Black has framed the criticism of Prince Andrew as a hysterical overreaction driven by sensationalist media and legal opportunism. He has dismissed the allegations made by Virginia Giuffre as lacking credible foundation and suggested that Andrew's ties to Epstein were the result of poor judgment, not criminal behavior. Black has consistently maintained that the prince’s decision to settle Giuffre’s civil lawsuit was a tactical move to protect the monarchy from further damage—not an admission of guilt—and has accused the press of exploiting the scandal to attack the royal family.

However, Black’s defense sidesteps critical facts that have contributed to public skepticism, including Prince Andrew’s well-documented visits to Epstein after his conviction, the infamous photograph with Giuffre, and the prince’s refusal to cooperate with U.S. authorities investigating Epstein’s trafficking ring. Many view Black’s unwavering support as emblematic of a broader elite impulse to shield insiders from consequences, no matter how serious the accusations. Rather than engaging with the mounting evidence and public outrage, Black’s rhetoric seeks to reframe Andrew as a misunderstood aristocrat rather than someone entangled in one of the most egregious sex trafficking networks in modern history. His defense speaks less to the facts of the case and more to the social class willing to rewrite reality in defense of its own.


To contact me:

[email protected]


source:

https://www.newsweek.com/prince-andrew-should-not-stripped-titles-media-mogul-conrad-black-pardoned-trump-1675694