Verse No 50
Unity Behind Diversity:
All distinctions — nāma, rūpa, karma — are superficial. Their substratum is Brahman alone.
Vivarta (Superimposition):
The world is not a real transformation of Brahman but an illusory appearance — just like a snake seen on a rope.
Role of Ignorance (Avidyā):
The perception of multiplicity arises only due to ignorance of the substratum (adhisthāna), i.e., Brahman.
Upaniṣadic Authority:
The teaching is not speculative but grounded in śruti, particularly in the Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad.
Implication of All Sense Objects and Actions:
By mentioning names, forms, and actions, the text implicitly includes all perceptual and functional diversity — but only as appearances in Brahman.
Verse No 51
1. Vivarta (Superimposed Appearance) Doctrine:
- The ornament (like a bracelet or ring) may have a different name and form, but its substance is only gold.
- Similarly, all objects and beings in the world have different names and forms, but their underlying reality is Brahman.
2. No Real Transformation (Aprakṛta Pariṇāma):
- In Advaita, Brahman does not really transform into the world.
- The world is a superimposition (vivarta) on Brahman, just like a bracelet is a form superimposed on gold.
3. Unchanging Reality:
- Gold remains gold in all forms.
- Brahman remains Brahman, even as the world appears to be full of multiplicity.
4. Identity of Cause and Effect:
- The effect (ornament or world) is not separate from its cause (gold or Brahman).
- This reinforces the non-dual (advaita) view — there is no second reality apart from Brahman.
5. Spiritual Insight:
- One who sees the ornament as gold is not deluded by its shape or name.
- Likewise, the wise see Brahman in all beings, not being deluded by superficial differences.
Verse No 52
1. Non-duality of Experience (Advaita):
- The world of experience appears to be populated by agent, action, object, and so on — but all are only appearances (vivarta) upon the one non-dual Brahman.
- There is only one substratum — all else is name and form (nāma-rūpa).
2. Illusion of Difference Breeds Fear:
- Fear (bhaya) arises only when there is a perception of otherness.
- Where there is duality, there is vulnerability, desire, aversion, and ultimately suffering.
- Hence, difference is the root of existential anxiety.
3. Even Subtle Duality is Binding:
- Even a slight conceptual gap, such as imagining “I am the devotee and Brahman is the object of devotion”, perpetuates duality, and thus fear.
4. Upaniṣadic Authority:
- The quote — "Yadā hyevaiṣa etasmin udaraṁ antaraṁ kurute, atha tasya bhayaṁ bhavati" (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.4.2) — is often cited to illustrate that:
- True fearlessness is only possible in the absolute non-dual state.
- Once there is a perceived “other,” fear naturally arises.
5. Vedāntic Sādhana:
- The goal is not just to negate gross difference, but also the subtlest sense of duality — even that involved in the most refined devotion or worship.
- Ultimately, upāsya (worshipped), upāsaka (worshipper), and upāsanā (worship) are all brahma-svarūpa.
Verse No 53
1. Different Loci Through Different States (Avasthā-bheda):
- Duality and non-duality don’t coexist simultaneously in one experience.
- They appear in different epistemic states:
- Dvaita = state of ignorance
- Advaita = state of knowledge
2. Illusory Nature of Duality (Dṛṣṭi-sṛṣṭi-vāda):
- Duality seems real only as long as ignorance persists.
- Once ignorance is dispelled, the entire appearance of duality collapses — not through destruction, but by dawning of truth.
3. Śruti Pramāṇa as Authority:
- Passages from the Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad show a clear transition:
- From "seeing the other" in duality,
- To "there is no other to see" in non-dual realization.
4. No ‘Other’ Remains in Realization:
- The idea of 'other' is itself a product of ignorance.
- When one realizes the Self as all, the very notions of seer, seen, and seeing dissolve.
5. Advaita’s Practical Import:
- This is not just metaphysics. As long as one clings to duality, one remains in fear, limitation, and bondage.
- Realization of non-duality brings fearlessness, freedom, and finality (mokṣa).
Verse No 54
1. No Duality, No Delusion
- Moha and śoka are born of mistaken duality.
- When duality is removed via Self-knowledge, their basis collapses.
2. State of Realization is a State of Freedom
- The "state" (avasthā-viśeṣa) here is not a mental mood or mystical trance, but a stable knowledge that there is only the Self.
- In this, the purified and prepared mind abides effortlessly in oneness (ekatva).
3. Adhikārī: The Qualified One
- The Upaniṣad is speaking not of theory, but of the direct experience (sākṣātkāra) of one who is prepared (adhikārī).
- This means one who has cultivated viveka, vairāgya, śamādi ṣaṭka-sampatti, and mumukṣutva.
4. Ekatvam as Vision, Not Imagination
- The phrase "ekatvam anupaśyataḥ" means: “for one who sees oneness.”
- This is not a belief or intellectual conviction — it is a clear vision (anupaśyana = direct seeing again and again).
5. Why There’s No Loss of Purpose
- The original objection presumes that dualistic striving gives purpose.
- But Advaita reveals that freedom itself is the purpose — and in non-duality, perfect fulfillment arises naturally.
6. Śruti as Ultimate Pramāṇa (Means of Knowledge)
- The quoted mantra from the Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad is central:
- “yasmin sarvāṇi bhūtāni ātmaiva abhūt, vijānataḥ…”
- This is not to be symbolically interpreted, but literally realized as the true vision of the liberated person.
Verse No 55
1. Śoka (Grief) Has a Cause: Dvaita (Duality)
- In Advaita, sorrow is not an existential inevitability, but a product of misperceived duality — the sense of “I am separate,” “this is other,” “that is lost,” etc.
2. The Remedy is Jñāna — Not Action or Emotion
- The Upaniṣadic mahāvākya:
"sa vā ayam ātmā brahma vijñānamayaḥ"
asserts the identity of the individual self (ātmā) with Brahman, the one, undivided consciousness.
- This eliminates duality at its root, thereby removing the cause of sorrow.
3. Pramāṇa (Means of Knowledge) is Śruti
- Śruti is not speculative but revelatory — it reveals what cannot be known otherwise (apratyakṣa, alaukika jñāna).
- Hence, this passage serves as decisive authority (pramāṇa) for the non-dual nature of reality.
4. Vijñānamayaḥ ≠ Modificatory "Sheath" Here
- Though “vijñānamaya” can sometimes refer to the intellect sheath (vijñānamaya kośa), here it clearly means:
Brahman is of the nature of pure consciousness — not inert, not partial, but fully self-revealing awareness.
5. "Ayam" Emphasizes Immediate Presence
- The use of “ayam” (“this very one”) indicates the immediacy and availability of the Self as Brahman.
- Brahman is not remote, but your very Self, right here and now.
✨ Final Summary
The cause of sorrow is duality. Its absence is proven by śruti, which declares:
"This very Self is Brahman, composed of consciousness."
This realization — when directly known — is liberation from sorrow.
The rest, as the bhāṣyakāra says, is clear to the prepared mind.