The world is an appearance upon Brahman, not a real modification.
Rope-Snake Analogy:
Just as a rope appears as a snake due to ignorance, the world appears as distinct due to avidyā (ignorance).
Brahman is Immutable:
Brahman remains untouched, unaltered, and unchanged through this appearance — maintaining nirvikāratva (changelessness).
Refutation of Other Theories:
Ārambhavāda (Nyāya–Vaiśeṣika): rejected
Pariṇāmavāda (Sāṅkhya): rejected
Vivartavāda (Advaita Vedānta): affirmed
Verse No 45
Brahman as the Upādāna-Kāraṇa:
The universe arises from Brahman itself, not from atoms (Nyāya–Vaiśeṣika) or Prakṛti (Sāṅkhya).
Role of Māyā:
Brahman appears as the world due to the limiting adjunct of māyā, not due to any real transformation — preserving Brahman’s changeless nature.
Scriptural Authority:
Upaniṣadic statements like “From the Self, space emerged” directly support this non-dual causality.
Rejection of Dual Causality Theories:
The idea that anything other than Brahman (like atoms or nature) could be the material cause of the universe is rejected.
Brahman ≠ Efficient Cause Alone:
Brahman is both the efficient cause (nimitta) and material cause (upādāna) — unlike in dualistic theologies where God creates the world using separate matter.